I thought one of the more intriguing articles for this module was the
Kobrin article on the role of technology in creating a globalized economy. He
goes back and forth a little on the pros and cons technology has had on private
networks, hierarchies and markets but his final line of the chapter, my favorite
line, says “Modern economic and political actors will have to learn to deal
with the ambiguity and the uncertainty of the post-modern future.” Essentially
he goes through how technology has influenced the emergence of a globalized economy from an internationalized economy but that
technology is here to stay and the drive for it will probably only increase.
This push for technology has spurred on the idea of privatized authority beyond
the state. One if his examples, the inability to regulate goods that are not
transmitted across geographic boundaries but are transferred digitally makes it
problematic to control, threatening autonomy and sovereignty. This example made
me consider the boom of blockchain technologies and cryptocurrency. I would
love to know his opinions on the use of blockchain.
My limited knowledge of blockchain is that at least some of
the technology is based on distributed ledger technology (DLT). Distributed
ledgers use independent computers to record, share, and synchronize transactions
in their respective electronic ledgers. DLT enables the recording of interactions
and transfer of “value” peer-to-peer without the need for a centrally
coordinating identity (World Bank). There are tech companies using DLT to
create verification systems for traceability and transparency in supply chains.
Companies like BanQu are using DLT to track a product, or “value” from one step
to the next in a supply chain “as the record is etched on the immutable
decentralized ledger that is the blockchain. This record is updated in real
time and creates a viewable and searchable ledger. This ledger can be viewed
and searched by anyone who has been granted permissions, but it can never be
tampered with.” (BanQu) Essentially, they are creating a trust network through
this distributed ledger on each of the independent computers recording and
synchronizing the data.
For those interested in adding more sovereign authority to
economic governance, maybe this isn’t the greatest news but it’s great news for
the millions of people around the world who previously had not “bankable”
identity. They can now take part in DLT through an app on their cell phone and
begin to do things like build a record to apply for credit, open bank accounts,
etc. And if the average person can use the technology on their cell phone,
perhaps there is a use to be found for governments to ensure secure trade and
monitor transactions.
Kobrin, Stephen, “Economic
Governance in an Electronically Networked Global Economy” in The Emergence of Private
Authority in Global Governance, ed. Tom Biersteker and Rodney Bruce Hall (Cambridge,
2002).
BanQu, “Revolutionizing Supply Chain,” 2018 http://www.banquapp.com/supply-chain-management/our-solution/.
World Bank, “Blockchain & Distributed Ledger Technology
(DLT)” The World Bank, April 12, 2018, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/blockchain-dlt.
Looking back at this and taking it within the context of module 7 and power transitions is an interesting exercise, particularly when examining it from the persepctive on what impact this type of technology has on hegemonic institutions. There is a widespread curiousity that surrounds blockchain, some states look in fear and some states look at awe at its potential. Russia is seeking to capitalize on the potential of this new technology as a way to supercede traditional Western dominated banking institutions and recently imposed sanctions. In short, this new technology offers a check to the Western dominated banking and financial institutions and is a development worthy of further observation.
ReplyDelete