What I loved about the lecture this week was the look at how, since its inception, IR theory has always been focused on the nation-state, sovereignty, and anarchy. Even those theories that try to get away from those ideas still need to be formulated in such a way that it caters to those who view the world that way. And so the idea of a world without sovereign borders, of a truly global village, is absolutely wild when you take a step back and look at it from the theorist's perspective.
Group Blog for Prof. Shirk's International Studies: History, Theory, and Practice Class, May 2018
Week 5 Pre-class
The idea of a world without sovereign states is absolutely mind-boggling from a theoretical standpoint. On its face we look at it and say, "Well, yeah it's been done in Star Trek, Star Wars, and all these other sci-fi universes and it looks pretty achievable." From a theoretical standpoint it seems increasingly difficult and, while not impossible, highly improbable short of a necessary outside stimulus.
Labels:
Module 3: Week 5,
Pre-class
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Now What?
We've come a long way in this course. I am glad that Hobbes was the foundation on which we built our learning as it provided a good refe...
-
This last class brought many different perspectives into the issue of the downfall of the United States, and aside from the issue of interna...
-
The central topic of the reading is whether ideas have any impact on policy outcomes and if so under what conditions. The author provid...
-
The Leviathan, written by well known political theorist Thomas Hobbes, explains the aspects that make up man and how man interact with each ...
When we started reading about neoliberalism and moved into constructivism I was looking forward to reading theories that moved away from the idea of sovereignty as the cornerstone for IR theory. I was a little disappointed when, as you put it, they still formulated their ideas in response to the thinking of those who view the world as focused on the nation-state, sovereignty, and anarchy. It seems that no matter the direction theories seem to develop in, they all stem from that ever-present rationalist focus on sovereignty. As professor Jackson mentioned at the beginning of the semester, the study of IR is still a new field of study. I wonder if, as the collective study is advanced, theorists will eventually begin their theories on something other than the idea of sovereignty. I think that would be a true indicator that fundamental change is on the way.
ReplyDelete